- Multiple idatabase instances windsor registration how to#
- Multiple idatabase instances windsor registration code#
The main part – shell – will be a window with the ListBox menu on the left side. TaskĪ process of creating a simple modular application will serve as an example.
Multiple idatabase instances windsor registration how to#
But it may not work for more complex tasks, so I’ll show you how to use a random container using Castle.Windsor. Yes, Caliburn.Micro, like many other frameworks, has its own DI-container – SimpleContainer and its capabilities would be quite sufficient for the further example. NET (it is assumed that the reader is familiar with DI and IoC). Castle.WindsorĬastle.Windsor is one of the most famous and functional DI-containers for. We will consider some of them below, while you can read about the rest in the documentation. Of course, Caliburn.Micro has a lot of capabilities. The conventions, if necessary, can be redefined. There are no Command and CommandParameter. Public string Login(string username, string password) Return !String.IsNullOrEmpty(username) & !String.IsNullOrEmpty(password) public bool CanLogin(string username, string password) Here in XAML, we specify neither ItemSource nor SelectedItem. NotifyOfPropert圜hange(() => SelectedProduct) Here are a couple of examples from their website: public BindableCollection Products
Multiple idatabase instances windsor registration code#
In fact, it creates bindings based on naming conventions, thereby preventing the developer from writing them manually and making the code shorter and cleaner. Caliburn.MicroĬaliburn.Micro is a framework that greatly simplifies the description of View and ViewModel. This article will discuss the development of a simple modular application using these tools. If a reader familiar with Prism reasonably point s out that I’m wrong and specifies the advantages of this framework – I will be grateful. After reading the tutorial, Prism with all its regions, MEF, and other artifacts seemed very complicated to me. In this article, I will not conduct a comparative analysis, because I do not have the experience of using Prism. Perhaps, the most famous framework for creating WPF applications with such architecture is Prism. I think everyone knows the advantages of modular architecture. This allows independently modify each of the components, c hange their contents, etc.
There is no direct dependence between them, only via contracts.
So, a modular application will be considered an application, which consists of the so-called shell and a set of plug-in modules. To start with, I want to specify what is meant by a modular application in this article.
0 kommentar(er)
